RUTGERS UNIVERSITY STUDENT INSTRUCTIONAL RATING FORM Fall 02
01 640 152 18 11299 HARTKE S ENROLL= 025 RESP= 20 STRONGLY STRONGLY # OF MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN DISAGREE NEUTRAL AGREE NO OF OF OF OF PART A: UNIVERSITY-WIDE QUESTIONS: 1 2 3 4 5 RESPONSES SECTION COURSE DEPT 100 LEVEL 1. The instructor was prepared for class and presented the material in an organized manner 0 1 1 9 9 0 4.30 4.27 4.24 4.20 2. The instructor responded effectively to student comments and questions 0 0 4 10 6 0 4.10 4.08 4.05 3.99 3. The instructor generated interest in the course material 2 0 8 6 4 0 3.50 3.75 3.81 3.76 4. The instructor had a positive attitude toward assisting all students in understanding course material 0 0 5 7 8 0 4.15 4.18 4.19 4.16 5. The instructor assigned grades fairly 2 3 1 8 6 0 3.65 4.00 4.11 4.10 6. The instructional methods encouraged student learning 1 2 5 7 5 0 3.65 3.71 3.72 3.66 7. I learned a great deal in this course 1 3 3 9 4 0 3.60 3.84 3.67 3.62 8. I had a strong prior interest in the subject matter and wanted to take this course 1 3 8 5 3 0 3.30 3.53 3.07 3.05 POOR EXCELLENT 9. I rate the teaching effectiveness of the instructor as 1 1 4 8 6 0 3.85 3.88 3.92 3.86 10. I rate the overall quality of the course as 1 0 4 13 2 0 3.75 3.70 3.70 3.65 PART B: QUESTIONS ADDED BY DEPARTMENT OR INSTRUCTOR: 11. 3 4 8 3 1 1 2.74 2.95 3.64 3.43 12. 0 1 1 5 10 3 4.41 4.44 4.11 4.04 13. 2 3 6 5 3 1 3.21 3.30 3.87 3.76 14. 1 3 13 2 0 1 2.84 2.84 3.85 3.69 15. 1 3 5 6 4 1 3.47 3.47 4.04 3.93 16. 1 0 7 4 7 1 3.84 3.84 4.13 4.02 17. 0 0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 4.27 4.14 18. 0 0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 4.19 4.05 19. 0 0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 4.11 3.95