RUTGERS UNIVERSITY STUDENT INSTRUCTIONAL RATING FORM Spring 02
01 640 135 04 60530 HARTKE S ENROLL= 033 RESP= 19 STRONGLY STRONGLY # OF MEAN MEAN MEAN MEAN DISAGREE NEUTRAL AGREE NO OF OF OF OF PART A: UNIVERSITY-WIDE QUESTIONS: 1 2 3 4 5 RESPONSES SECTION COURSE DEPT 100 LEVEL 1. The instructor was prepared for class and presented the material in an organized manner 0 0 0 7 12 0 4.63 4.32 4.25 4.16 2. The instructor responded effectively to student comments and questions 0 0 2 6 11 0 4.47 4.18 4.11 4.03 3. The instructor generated interest in the course material 0 1 6 5 7 0 3.95 3.93 3.87 3.76 4. The instructor had a positive attitude toward assisting all students in understanding course material 0 0 2 4 13 0 4.58 4.22 4.21 4.12 5. The instructor assigned grades fairly 0 1 1 7 10 0 4.37 4.07 4.10 4.02 6. The instructional methods encouraged student learning 0 0 4 10 5 0 4.05 3.84 3.78 3.67 7. I learned a great deal in this course 0 0 5 8 6 0 4.05 3.86 3.81 3.70 8. I had a strong prior interest in the subject matter and wanted to take this course 1 2 9 4 3 0 3.32 3.05 3.14 3.04 POOR EXCELLENT 9. I rate the teaching effectiveness of the instructor as 0 0 2 6 11 0 4.47 4.08 4.00 3.89 10. I rate the overall quality of the course as 0 0 6 8 5 0 3.95 3.75 3.76 3.65 PART B: QUESTIONS ADDED BY DEPARTMENT OR INSTRUCTOR: 11. 0 2 2 8 3 4 3.80 3.66 3.76 3.76 12. 1 1 4 8 1 4 3.47 3.53 3.73 3.61 13. 0 1 3 7 4 4 3.93 4.00 4.05 3.97 14. 1 1 8 4 0 5 3.07 3.19 3.72 3.52 15. 0 0 0 0 0 19 0.00 4.00 3.86 3.67 16. 0 0 0 0 0 19 0.00 3.00 3.95 3.80 17. 0 0 0 0 0 19 0.00 3.00 3.86 3.60 18. 0 0 0 0 0 19 0.00 3.00 4.00 3.71 19. 0 0 0 0 0 19 0.00 1.00 2.55 2.00